Okay, count me among those somewhat uncommitted voters galvanized by Sarah Palin. Don’t get me wrong, I was certainly going to vote Democratic this fall. I just haven’t found myself on the Obama Bandwagon. My man was John Edwards. I liked how he kept the issue of poverty and increasing opportunity on the table as no other candidate did. Then, when he dropped out, Hillary was my girl. When she conceded, I knew I’d have to vote for Obama, but I wasn’t passionate about it.
Then Sarah Palin showed up. And suddenly I was seeing Bush in a dress. The willful ignorance and the almost proud and boastful attitude about it. The incuriousness. The lack of scholarship. The attitude that you didn’t need to address issues with facts, or respond to media questioning. You could just bluff your way through anything. Because “who cares about all that learnin’ stuff. Off the cuff comments are better airplay.” That whole Republican mantra about “elitism”, which defines elite as educated, thoughtful, curious, experienced and insightful.
Something about Palin is sending me reeling back to my third generation immigrant roots. Having a grandfather who came over from Poland and an immigrant husband is really starting to affect my voting judgement.
The odd thing is that my husband and grandfather are worlds apart, but America was their common answer. Today, I’m not sure either would find the same answers here. And that’s why I’m getting mobilized.
My grandfather’s family was just above serf level in Poland at a time when that country was under Russia’s bootheel. Polish nationals were denied education and opportunity. In fact, Poland at that point (pre World War One) had disappeared from the map. My grandfather’s father brought him over here because the extended family pooled their resources in the hopes that my great grandfather could get a good enough job to buy land and bring the rest of the family over. That happened, but it happened slowly, with each member brought over immediately getting work, living on the family farm in Vermont and helping to pay off the mortgage. My grandfather, whose brains I hope I inherited, spoke seven languages by the time he was 12 (English, Polish, Russian, Czech, French, German, Ukrainian dialect), and landed his first job as a court translator at that time. He had to stop schooling after high school, but he vowed that every one of his children — and every one of his relatives he could help — would be educated. Not just at college, but at the best colleges. Not just at the best college, but top of their classes.
He succeeded. His son, my father, got a Congressional appointment to West Point and graduated near the top of his class. Then went on to Masters Degrees at Rensselaer and MIT. His daughter went to Middlebury and wrote for the New Yorker. Among the relatives he goaded, encouraged and helped pay for were kids who went to MIT, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Mount Holyoke, Vassar and Princeton.
I’m not sure he was disappointed in me when I went to a Seven Sisters College (Mt. Holyoke) instead of Harvard, which he’d set his sights on for me, and when I studied English and Art History instead of Law or Economics, but I remember the weekly phone calls urging me to study, study, study and be the best.
This was a guy as Joe Six-Pack as Sarah Palin would ever meet. He was the shop steward and Union rep at the Brother’s Gear Shaper Plant in Springfield Vermont for his entire career. But he certainly didn’t have her disdain for intellect and learning. He embraced learning and demanded it of his entire extended family. To him, the opportunity for education was what America offered, as no other country did.
Just because he was Joe Six Pack with a Polish accent didn’t make him so stupid that he would have fallen for her platitudes, empty speeches and blathering in circles which she thinks are enough for her “just folks constituents”. I remember telling him about my Political Science classes and listening to him make arguments that had my head spinning. He used to have spirited political debates with a Russian neighbor and loved calling me at college to tell me when he’d just won a point off his friend “Sasha”. Only years later did I learn that “Sasha” was Alexander Solzhenitsyn. You see, my Grandfather — unlike Sarah Palin — could name all the periodicals he read — and there were many of them, including The Times of London and other foreign newspapers. Being Joe Six Pack, back then didn’t preclude being an autodidact and one who could hold his own with one of the leading intellectuals of his day. He loved learning until the day he died and never hesitated to hammer that point into everyone in his extended family.
Which is a rambling way to bring me to the other end of the immigrant spectrum: my husband. If I may say so, I think he’s a genius. And he graduated from university at a time when England was sending only 2% of her high school graduates to university. But there were no jobs in England for him in the Seventies. They were locked up by families with connections. So although he was Middle Class with a Cambridge educated father, he headed for America where ambition and education were being rewarded.
This all brings me to why Sarah Palin has energized me. She is the apotheosis of what seems to be the growing Republican mantra of “anti-elitism” which defines elite as being educated, smart and ambitious. It’s the mantra that allows Karl Rove to characterized Obama, the child of a single mother and raised on food stamps who earned his way to Harvard and success on his on intellectual brilliance, as “the guy at the country club with a Martini sneering at the rest of us.” While Bush, who really is the child of privilege who was raised in the country club but threw away all his advantages on booze, drugs and youth as a wastrel, as a just folks-guy who you’d like to have a beer with.
I’m going with late night host Jon Stewart’s comment: “I want a president who is elite. I want a president who is embarrassingly superior to me. Who speaks six languages and sleeps two hours a night.”
So why is Sarah Palin energizing me? Because I’ve just had it up to here with this Republican pandering to a dumbed-down America they think will reject education, natural ability and talent. An America they think will roll over and watch “Star Search” while they plunder the economy and squander America’s resources.
These are tough times. This is not the moment for a soccer mom and a guy who, admittedly was heroic in the war, but hasn’t shown much leadership since. This is when we need to gather the best and the brightest to help us weather greater crises than we’ve faced in decades.
And what’s wrong with an elite? I’m thinking of one of our greatest presidents, Franklin Roosevelt. No one can deny he had one of the most privileged upbringings in America for either his time or ours. Didn’t stop him from understanding how to get the working man back on his feet during the Great Depression. How about most of our Founding Fathers who were the very definition of the elite yet laid a groundwork for a country that my Polish grandfather could see as a land of opportunity? What do we lose when we buy into this “anti-elitist” mantra? We lose people like my grandfather and my husband, who both, I would argue made indelible contributions to this country. Who are both the kinds of people we WANT to keep this country competitive.
Thomas Jefferson defined elitism this way: “There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents. . .” I think that’s the aristocracy, and the America my grandfather believed in. When he told us “study, study, study” he was urging us to be fit for leadership, or be fit to vote.
I’m thinking what made America great was the fact that it used to reward hard work, intellectual ability and learning. Who are the most successful immigrants? I’d argue the Chinese and the Jews top that list and both groups saw America as a place that prized and rewarded education — and afforded that opportunity based on talent not on position.
When did that change?
I want the America that rewarded my grandfather and my husband. I want the America that recognizes a “Natural Aristocracy Among Men”. I want a country that doesn’t see taking a place in the world and learning about different cultures as a bad thing.
Oh yes, I’m one of those kids that finished high school and went on a backpacking trip around Europe. My family wasn’t rich and I wasn’t “given” the trip. I earned the money for my Eurail Pass and the Youth Hostels I stayed in. But what I learned on that trip was invaluable. It’s apparently a lesson Sarah Palin never learned and has no interest in learning. That lesson? Other countries and peoples have different viewpoints from what you hear in the local mall.
When I think of Palin, I also think of a Marketing Vice President that my husband hired. He’d seldom been out of the States and on his trip to a trade show in Germany, he so embarrassed the company and clients SCREAMING LOUDLY AT THE FOREIGNERS and demanding hamburgers that he was almost immediately let go. My husband has since revised some of his hiring interview questions to address if the candidate has a passport, how long they’ve had it and how much they’ve travelled. Yes, it’s that important in this economy. It’s even more important in a critical government position.
My rambling point? Let’s strike a blow for what made America great. Easy access to education. A system that rewards the best, the brightest, the smartest, the most ambitious. Stand up and say you are elite. Or stand up and say, like me, that you are trying to be elite, at least as Thomas Jefferson describes it. And vote for the smartest candidate. Please.
And that smartest candidate. Gotta be Obama. He’s especially impressive when you consider his background and where he got himself to on his own talent and initiative. Then factor in that he has the intelligence to surround himself with smart people, not necessarily people in lockstep with him, but, like Biden, people with the deep experience to help dig us out of these crises. I have to say it now (thanks Sarah Palin) but Go Obama!
Love this post. I don’t agree about the passport comment as I think there aer many ways to learn about other cultures and ways of life and not all of us are able to afford (I don’t mean only monetarily) that luxury, but in my view it doesn’t nec. mean one would not be qualified for say the marketing mgr. pos. you mention. But, in the case of a world leader, yes, it is very important. Even more telling is as you noted the lack of interest in and even the disdain for education, exposure to many cultures and views, etc.
I also very much dislike the blatant disregard for accountability to the American people and the complete lack of honest and the regular denial of reality. Saying you don’t care to answer a deb. moderator’s questions, refusing to give interviews so public can learn about your and your views, etc., not answering important questions, attacking others when your views are weak or you don’t have a good answer, I could go on and on. This worries me as we’ve already had a pres. who doesn’t care about this stuff, and McPalin seem even worse in this regard than Bush. What would it be like if they were in office (heaven forbid).
Like you I too have seen America change over time and also hope it can reach the same heights it once did and provide the same kind of opportunities for the Am. people. As a former teacher, I especially worry for the state of educ. in this country and for where it willbe headed under a Rep. administration. Same goes for healthcare (one of my top top issues), foreign policy, and economy, etc.
Thank you for writing this. I’ve been meaning to write a post on the election and my person connection to some issues but so far haven’t gotten too far past twittering constantly. And btw, you family sounds awesome!
Thanks for your comments M,
But I don’t see travel as out of reach for anyone. I’m always impressed by the Australians who understand that they are isolated and make it a priority to travel extensively either after high school or after college. You meet Australians who are children of privilege but also Australians who are auto mechanics’ kids and children of single parents who are backpacking around. They seem to view it as an extended part of their education.
Travel doesn’t have to be to the Ritz in Paris, but it could be to Mexico or another country where you can still do it on about $5 a day.
Even if you can’t afford it when you are young, when you get to your forties and you’ve amassed a net worth of $2 million dollars like Sarah Palin, you CAN afford it. If you want to be in a job or in politics where such exposure is critical, you can’t afford NOT to do it.
I ran across this post after seeing a comment you left on a Flickr picture from Barack Obama’s rally at MSU yesterday.
I just wanted to thank and compliment you on your well written post. I am also the grand-daughter of an immigrant who strongly encouraged his children and grandchildren to pursue their educations. Your description of your grandfather brought back many fond memories of my own grandfather.
The current mindset of the Republicans is scary to me. Palin, and those who think like her, will put our country back so far after all we have accomplished throughout it’s grand history.
I, also, wish to elect leaders who are smart, ambitious, cultured and motivated to bring out the best in America. Welcome to the Obama camp!
Something that angered me most about the Couric interview was the way she spoke about people who took a year off from college to backpack around Europe. She sneered when she said it.
I didn’t have money. My college education cost $60 a credit, and even that was too much for my parents, so my great aunt paid for some of my college education. When I graduated, I traveled across the country in a Ford Escort wagon for without air conditioning for six weeks. I was with my boyfriend, and he had very little money. I didn’t travel to Europe until my honeymoon, and I did that with wedding gift money. We drove a borrowed car and stayed with friends.
My point: you don’t have to be rich to travel. So the sneer showed even more ignorance and disdain for things not of her interest. It’s all right to be uninterested in travel. It’s not all right to claim expertise in foreign policy when you have been nowhere.
Maybe she should have supported the bridge to nowhere. It would have been her first real trip.
We have more in common than a love for smooth fox terriers.
Where to begin? I was so riled up last night I could hardly sleep – lucky for you the time zone (and bottles of wine) were on your side.
I too rarely wax poetic on politics in a public form…but it is too risky to stay silent!
The current secretary of education has a bachelor’s degree in POLITICAL SCIENCE. Her official biography states that she is the “first mother of school-aged children to serve as Education Secretary.” This is a qualification to lead the national department of education? According to the definition of a “highly-qualified teacher” – she is not highly qualified for her position.
I’m with John Stewart- I want an elitist president as well. Have you seen the new PBS show with Mario Batalli – Spain, On the Road Again? There is a beautiful Spanish actress by the name of Claudia Bassols who also stars in the show –
(from wikipedia)
Her education includes a degree in Musical Comedy (Coco Comín, Barcelona), with further drama studies in Paris, London, Los Angeles, at UNCW, and at NIDA. She also studied English language and literature at the University of Barcelona.
She speaks Spanish, Catalan, English, Swedish, French, and Italian.
How’s that for beauty AND brains?
To counter m – as others have said – you do not have to be rich to travel. You have to be EDUCATED. Educated by those who know of opportunities like the peace corps or study abroad programs at universities. I am lucky to work at a university with one of the largest study abroad programs in the United States. We go to great lengths to make sure the programs are comparable cost wise to domestic study.
I am constantly amazed by those who have never traveled outside a 60-mile radius of their own home town. Granted cars, airplane tickets, hotels, cost money – however – you can very inexpensively stay in youth hostels, campgrounds or budget hotels. Heck – there are even websites dedicated to home swapping! Or, you can be a stranger in your own home town…find local farmers, merchants, historians – get to know your neighbors. Worldliness is also a state of mind.
The end of Barack’s speech yesterday speaks to the story you told about your grandfather —
I can’t find the exact transcript, here is the ending “as prepared for delivery” on his website –
We can do this. Americans have done this before. Some of us had grandparents or parents who said maybe I can’t go to college but my child can; maybe I can’t have my own business but my child can. I may have to rent, but maybe my children will have a home they can call their own. I may not have a lot of money but maybe my child will run for Senate. I might live in a small village but maybe someday my son can be president of the United States of America.
As I mentioned in my first comment, I don’t mean travel being out of reach just monetarily. There are many life situations that make it impossible for some, maybe even many, people to travel abroad, and for some to travel at all.
And of course $ can be an issue too. For example 5$ a day may be spending money on a trip but one has to pay for flight or drive, time off work, childcare perhaps, etc. And that’s not even taking into account, again, other circumstances unrelated to money that may prevent traveling beyond a short road trip. Those could include illness, family issues and obligations, and much more.
I may have misworded part of my comment (I wrote it late at night and was really tired) so it may have come across as defending Palin, that wasn’t my meaning or intent. I agree that given her position– both financially and professionally — her attitude toward learning about the outside world seems quite inadequate.
My point was also to say that in my view not having foreign travel experience in no way automatically means not being able to do just as well interacting and functioning among people of other cultures and nations as one who has traveled, and that there are a variety of ways to become sensitive and educated culturally.
And also that I don’t believe world travel is open to everyone, by any means. Many people are barely hanging on and struggle with day to day survival–again whether due to monetary, health, or other reasons or a combination thereof. To suggest anyone could travel, even to Mexico, I think is simply unfair and not taking into account the diversity of situations among people and the great and all encompassing struggles many lives are made of.
Leslie–I felt the exact same way about Palin’s comments on those who take a year off to travel before (or after) college. Very judgmental and IMO at least in part just an excuse to explain her own situation which she’s been getting called out on. Yes, some are funded by their families on trips and through many other parts of life. To suggest that that is the only way one can afford such travel is absurd, of course. My guess is it was maybe just another way for her to dig in that knife and make the divide b/w so called elite and joe six pack a little deeper–saying, they are traveling on others’ money while we ordinary Americans are working hard for a living. In other words, I don’t know if it was a political move, a genuine belief, both or something else. Either way, like much of what I hear from McPalin is was untrue, an attack, snide, obnoxious, intended to divert attention from areas over which she’s been criticized.
Leigh–Wow, this got so long, sorry!
Perhaps my comment wasn’t clear,but I did state when I said not everyone “can afford” world travel that I meant “can’t afford” in a sense wider than just monetarily. (From my orig. comment: “Not all of us are able to afford (I don’t mean only monetarily) that luxury.”) I said nothing about being rich and pointed out I meant afford in ways not applying to money or not only to money at least. There’s more explanation of my meaning in my response to Lisa above.
Saying worldliness is a state of mind then implying not traveling away from your hometown is something negative (I’m sorry if that’s not what you meant, it read that way to me based on the context of your entire comment but I realize you did not actually say that and that I can’t be certain what you meant by it) seems contradictory. I agree with your worldliness comment which is exactly what I said in my orig. comment–that there are many ways to learn about cultures and other nations and that not everyone can or will travel (for a variety of reasons). That I don’t believe that the “untraveled” somehow lack the ability, knowledge, or finesse to interact well with those of other cultures/nations, etc.
Additionally for many yes money is an issue as well. If you can’t afford even time off, you work three jobs just to stay barely afloat, how do you take time off to travel to your $5 a day hostel, campground, etc.? There are just so many factors involved here and so many reasons why this may not be possible for some people that it’s really hard for me to understand this view that *anyone* can travel internationally.
I also don’t get the implication that if one hasn’t traveled abroad he or she is somehow less able to function among people from other nations, etc. Someone may learn more about other cultures from those he or she knows right at home than someone traveling to places where he or she never or barely interacts with the local population despite being abroad.
I wish it were true that all that is required is education or interest in order to be able to travel abroad. There are many struggles in life that can and do prevent travel, many of them unrelated, at least directly, to money OR education.
And for some, money and/or education truly *are* obstacles. Some may not have the nec. education to know about certain opportunities. It certainly is not a fact that all people have access to the same level and types of education/background, etc.. People should be evaluated not on the opportunities they may happen to have or not have through no fault of their own, but on what they DO w/the opportunities and abilities they DO HAVE.
To me the attitude that *anyone* can travel abroad or that all that’s required is education, or that one can travel so cheaply that money isn’t a factor really dismisses and minimizes the many serious struggles many face in life. Where do people who are mentally ill, physically ill, severely disabled, caring for a dependent family member, working numerous jobs day and night and still can’t get by, in debt to their eyeballs from medical bills, who don’t travel due to environmental reasons, etc etc. etc fit into your mindset on this topic?
I don’t mean any of this as a pesonal attack. I hate discussing things like this online bc I’m never sure how the tone, etc comes across. I just disagree with you on this issue (at least in part, I agree w/ your comment on worldliness), and don’t mean to make any personal judgments of you or to sound combative. If I do, I apologize, it’s realy not my intention.
You are correct M, on all points. However, once you get very very comfortably Middle Class, as the Palins are (Net worth near $2 million). And you aspire to jobs where diplomacy, knowledge beyond your own borders and some level of sophistication are prerequisites (such as Governor, but, of course, Vice President!), then it behooves you to get out there and get educated and travel. She isn’t a poor little college student — hasn’t been for more than 20 years. So I’m not buying that excuse from her.
Yes I agree it’s quite different in Palin’s situation. I’ve felt that all along and tried to say so in my 1st comment but I think I somehow miswrote, adding a negative into a sentence or something and thus skewing my meaning. I do understand the concern with Palin situation. And I find her excuse lacking, as well as offensive.
@ m – no offense taken! it helps to write this stuff out so we can clarify our own thinking! 🙂
I just came across this post while poking around the archives. My god, what a foreshadowing of what has come to be in late 2016!